<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t axe Crossrail &#8211; double it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/05/20/dont-axe-crossrail-double-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/05/20/dont-axe-crossrail-double-it/</link>
	<description>The idle musings of John B</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wadsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/05/20/dont-axe-crossrail-double-it/comment-page-1/#comment-42425</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wadsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/05/20/dont-axe-crossrail-double-it/#comment-42425</guid>
		<description>Good point on PFI. The relevant liability is the NPV of payments minus NPV of services to be provided. We all know that there is a net liability, i.e. the government has overpaid, because there are firms who specialise in buying up the contracts before a stone has been laid and flogging them on to actual developers (Secondary Market Investment Funds, they are called).

As to Crossrail, this should be put to a popular vote in the areas that will benefit, and, if approved, funded out of Land Value Tax receipts from those areas. Ooops. We don&#039;t have Land Value Tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point on PFI. The relevant liability is the NPV of payments minus NPV of services to be provided. We all know that there is a net liability, i.e. the government has overpaid, because there are firms who specialise in buying up the contracts before a stone has been laid and flogging them on to actual developers (Secondary Market Investment Funds, they are called).</p>
<p>As to Crossrail, this should be put to a popular vote in the areas that will benefit, and, if approved, funded out of Land Value Tax receipts from those areas. Ooops. We don&#8217;t have Land Value Tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuestionThat</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/05/20/dont-axe-crossrail-double-it/comment-page-1/#comment-40280</link>
		<dc:creator>QuestionThat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/05/20/dont-axe-crossrail-double-it/#comment-40280</guid>
		<description>Not sure if the above is a veiled advertisement for EarthLab.com or not, but assuming its not there&#039;s loads of Green blogs in the blogroll at my place.

I suggest that this one is probably as good a place as any to start: http://jimjay.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if the above is a veiled advertisement for EarthLab.com or not, but assuming its not there&#8217;s loads of Green blogs in the blogroll at my place.</p>
<p>I suggest that this one is probably as good a place as any to start: <a href="http://jimjay.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://jimjay.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/05/20/dont-axe-crossrail-double-it/comment-page-1/#comment-40201</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/05/20/dont-axe-crossrail-double-it/#comment-40201</guid>
		<description>Hey!  I agree about not canceling the Crossrail.  You make some great points to back up your arguement.  I was browsing through a bunch of political websites and blogs (mostly liberal ones) and I came across your blog and find it to be very interesting.  There are a bunch of others I like too, like huff post, and other news sites like politico.  Do you know of any that cover politics and the environment?  I saw earthlab.com which has mostly environmental info but some politics.  I took EarthLab.com’s carbon calculator (http://www.earthlab.com/signupprofile/).  It was pretty easy to use (and it doesn’t make me feel guilty after I take it).  Are there any other blogs you would recommend?  Can you drop me a link to your favorites or any ones with green info?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  I agree about not canceling the Crossrail.  You make some great points to back up your arguement.  I was browsing through a bunch of political websites and blogs (mostly liberal ones) and I came across your blog and find it to be very interesting.  There are a bunch of others I like too, like huff post, and other news sites like politico.  Do you know of any that cover politics and the environment?  I saw earthlab.com which has mostly environmental info but some politics.  I took EarthLab.com’s carbon calculator (<a href="http://www.earthlab.com/signupprofile/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.earthlab.com/signupprofile/)</a>.  It was pretty easy to use (and it doesn’t make me feel guilty after I take it).  Are there any other blogs you would recommend?  Can you drop me a link to your favorites or any ones with green info?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

