<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back, and an apology of sorts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/10/01/back-and-an-apology-of-sorts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/10/01/back-and-an-apology-of-sorts/</link>
	<description>The idle musings of John B</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: crossland</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/10/01/back-and-an-apology-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-65267</link>
		<dc:creator>crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=172#comment-65267</guid>
		<description>What is the Tory plan re - administration and the BOE?

I&#039;ve read Yorkshire ranters posts and it does seem like lying/back of fag packet stuff.

Is this fair ? are people missing something about what the tories were proposing for NR and B+B ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the Tory plan re &#8211; administration and the BOE?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read Yorkshire ranters posts and it does seem like lying/back of fag packet stuff.</p>
<p>Is this fair ? are people missing something about what the tories were proposing for NR and B+B ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/10/01/back-and-an-apology-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-64960</link>
		<dc:creator>John B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=172#comment-64960</guid>
		<description>Hmm. It&#039;s an interesting piece, but basically wrong: although he&#039;s correct on the insurance scam and on the general confusion, the underlying loans, in general, &lt;i&gt;aren&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; bad. 

That&#039;s why the whole current mess is so bizarre and surreal - very few of the assets are &#039;toxic&#039;, but because nobody knows which are or which bank will be irrationally forced into bankruptcy next week despite its underlying assets being OK, nobody&#039;s willing to lend anyone anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. It&#8217;s an interesting piece, but basically wrong: although he&#8217;s correct on the insurance scam and on the general confusion, the underlying loans, in general, <i>aren&#8217;t</i> bad. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why the whole current mess is so bizarre and surreal &#8211; very few of the assets are &#8216;toxic&#8217;, but because nobody knows which are or which bank will be irrationally forced into bankruptcy next week despite its underlying assets being OK, nobody&#8217;s willing to lend anyone anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Teabag</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/10/01/back-and-an-apology-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-64775</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Teabag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=172#comment-64775</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2008/09/economic_disasters_and_stupid.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; was pretty good, I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2008/09/economic_disasters_and_stupid.php" rel="nofollow">This</a> was pretty good, I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

