<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did you forget to take your medication?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/</link>
	<description>The idle musings of John B</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:43:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Banditry &#187; Must&#8230; not&#8230; like&#8230; pretend&#8230; buffoon</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-100920</link>
		<dc:creator>Banditry &#187; Must&#8230; not&#8230; like&#8230; pretend&#8230; buffoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-100920</guid>
		<description>[...] I might, through extremely gritted teeth, vote for them this time round as discussed. But my God, they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I might, through extremely gritted teeth, vote for them this time round as discussed. But my God, they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-90945</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-90945</guid>
		<description>Err, no. That&#039;s 2 years before the public smoking ban in England. 

On the day the smoking ban came into force, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6273830.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;all House of Commons bars became non-smoking&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err, no. That&#8217;s 2 years before the public smoking ban in England. </p>
<p>On the day the smoking ban came into force, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6273830.stm" rel="nofollow">all House of Commons bars became non-smoking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laban Tall</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-90898</link>
		<dc:creator>Laban Tall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-90898</guid>
		<description>This post would have been better with references - hyperlinks would do. So I have to search to find out whether smoking is really banned in the House of Commons bar :

The Commission agreed that, with effect from 4 April 2005,

    *

      the estate should be smoke free save as otherwise provided:
    *

      smoking should continue to be permitted in the Members Smoking Room, Annie&#039;s Bar, Bellamy&#039;s Bar and the Churchill Room Bar, but not in other catering outlets: and that steps should be taken to improve ventilation in those bars where smoking is to be permitted:
    *

      smoking places should be identified off the Committee Corridor and in a covered area outside the main building:
    *

      advice and assistance should be offered to those seeking to give up smoking:

and that such changes should be communicated via the All-Party Whip to be published on 27 January. 

I don&#039;t know how many bars HoC has, but 3 smoking bars seems pretty good to me. I bet you can take your drink into the smoking room as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post would have been better with references &#8211; hyperlinks would do. So I have to search to find out whether smoking is really banned in the House of Commons bar :</p>
<p>The Commission agreed that, with effect from 4 April 2005,</p>
<p>    *</p>
<p>      the estate should be smoke free save as otherwise provided:<br />
    *</p>
<p>      smoking should continue to be permitted in the Members Smoking Room, Annie&#8217;s Bar, Bellamy&#8217;s Bar and the Churchill Room Bar, but not in other catering outlets: and that steps should be taken to improve ventilation in those bars where smoking is to be permitted:<br />
    *</p>
<p>      smoking places should be identified off the Committee Corridor and in a covered area outside the main building:<br />
    *</p>
<p>      advice and assistance should be offered to those seeking to give up smoking:</p>
<p>and that such changes should be communicated via the All-Party Whip to be published on 27 January. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how many bars HoC has, but 3 smoking bars seems pretty good to me. I bet you can take your drink into the smoking room as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-90544</link>
		<dc:creator>John B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-90544</guid>
		<description>due to utter shitness of wordpress &amp; my phone (why d&#039;you have to have sexy javascript &#039;approve&#039; buttons that don&#039;t exist on primitive browsers, when you could just have a fucking link and some css?), new commenters on this post have been marked as spam. sorry. will sort when at a real PC and have time, which mightn&#039;t be for a while. cheers for reaction to this everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>due to utter shitness of wordpress &#038; my phone (why d&#8217;you have to have sexy javascript &#8216;approve&#8217; buttons that don&#8217;t exist on primitive browsers, when you could just have a fucking link and some css?), new commenters on this post have been marked as spam. sorry. will sort when at a real PC and have time, which mightn&#8217;t be for a while. cheers for reaction to this everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Round Up 19th April 2009 &#124; worldismycountry.org</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-90535</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Round Up 19th April 2009 &#124; worldismycountry.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-90535</guid>
		<description>[...] One such angry right wing diatribe was picked up from The Guardian&#8217;s Comment is Free and magnificently dissected by John Band.   Like this post? Then share it with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One such angry right wing diatribe was picked up from The Guardian&#8217;s Comment is Free and magnificently dissected by John Band.   Like this post? Then share it with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-90447</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-90447</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Actually, in Scotland, that is not exactly true…&lt;/em&gt;

I had a small involvement in that case, and I can tell you that the dad&#039;s statement that he only &quot;smacked&quot; his child &quot;once&quot; is strongly contradicted by at least ten eyewitnesses.   One witness told the court - under oath, with penalties for lying, mind - that it was a &quot;vicious attack&quot;.  

Of course, all of that is considerably less exciting than &lt;em&gt;OMFG the totalitarian PC leftist thought police will imprison us all in teh ZaNu-Labour re-education camp!&lt;/em&gt;  

There&#039;s a lesson to be learnt here about selective reading, granting credence to convicted liars for political reasons and the shittiness of tabloid journalism, if you care to learn it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Actually, in Scotland, that is not exactly true…</em></p>
<p>I had a small involvement in that case, and I can tell you that the dad&#8217;s statement that he only &#8220;smacked&#8221; his child &#8220;once&#8221; is strongly contradicted by at least ten eyewitnesses.   One witness told the court &#8211; under oath, with penalties for lying, mind &#8211; that it was a &#8220;vicious attack&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Of course, all of that is considerably less exciting than <em>OMFG the totalitarian PC leftist thought police will imprison us all in teh ZaNu-Labour re-education camp!</em>  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lesson to be learnt here about selective reading, granting credence to convicted liars for political reasons and the shittiness of tabloid journalism, if you care to learn it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Z</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-90445</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-90445</guid>
		<description>On the point about DNA being stored even if not charged, I think that has now been overturned after a legal ruling in every right-wing maniac&#039;s favourite institution - the European Court of Human Rights. 

What with the Stalinist French plot waste of money bureaucratic dictatorship our masters in Brussels European Union going after the networks on data protection re Phorm, bloggertarians must be finding things very hard to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the point about DNA being stored even if not charged, I think that has now been overturned after a legal ruling in every right-wing maniac&#8217;s favourite institution &#8211; the European Court of Human Rights. </p>
<p>What with the Stalinist French plot waste of money bureaucratic dictatorship our masters in Brussels European Union going after the networks on data protection re Phorm, bloggertarians must be finding things very hard to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-90442</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-90442</guid>
		<description>Can you have a word with this lot&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXk4nLIv5jo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this lot&lt;/a&gt;, John?

&lt;i&gt;I think that the law was / is about to be changed on this, isn’t it?&lt;/i&gt;

Paulie, it&#039;s been two years since Gordon Brown made the promise, as part of the swishing of his new broom, to repeal that part of SOCPA. We&#039;re still waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you have a word with this lot<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXk4nLIv5jo" rel="nofollow">this lot</a>, John?</p>
<p><i>I think that the law was / is about to be changed on this, isn’t it?</i></p>
<p>Paulie, it&#8217;s been two years since Gordon Brown made the promise, as part of the swishing of his new broom, to repeal that part of SOCPA. We&#8217;re still waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-90433</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-90433</guid>
		<description>Simply brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggertarians rebutted - Common Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johnband.org/blog/2009/04/17/432/comment-page-1/#comment-90430</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggertarians rebutted - Common Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnband.org/blog/?p=432#comment-90430</guid>
		<description>[...] Point by point by Banditry. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Point by point by Banditry. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
