Justin is looking for constructive suggestions on what Labour could possibly do to get over their steamrollering. Mine include:
1) keep the 21% basic tax rate; abolish tax credits; and use the money saved by abolishing the 10p band to raise the personal allowance;
2) abolish NI and raise the basic and higher tax rates to compensate [this helps part-time workers, who don’t earn enough to pay income tax but are currently forced to pay NI anyway];
3) assume an acceptable public sector deficit level of 5% this year and 8% for 2009. Keep spending flat as a % of GDP and use any “surplus” cash to further raise the income tax threshold
4) Bring in a few daft-but-populist-and-fairly-cheap things: halt post office closures (even though nobody uses them, they clearly have talisman value to Middle England); bring back matrons (this probably involves renaming ’senior charge nurses’ to ‘matrons’ or similar); raise the state pension by a few bob; accept that the justice system is too beholden to the tabloids to get prison numbers down so build more (small, local) prisons; etc.
5) change the electoral system to make sure the Tories don’t get as much power as Labour had if they win: introduce some kind of PR (probably a Scottish Parliament kind of thing), create more elected mayors, devolve more central responsibilities to local authorities, give the GLA the same responsibilities as the Welsh Assembly (double-bonus: short-term, you look statesmanlike for handing power over to Boris; long-term, you get even more PR benefits when he messes up…)
However, I don’t think they’ll be anywhere near enough. There’s a small possibility that David Cameron is the Tories’ Neil Kinnock, and Labour will just scrape in at the next general election amid concerns over his competence despite popular loathing for the incumbent party, but it’s more likely based on last night’s results that the Tories will win next time.
…which brings me to my main point: Gordon Brown’s worst political move, both in terms of the Labour Party and his own legacy, was calling off the snap election last autumn. Even at the time, it was clear that he had a chance of winning – but it’s become clear since that losing would have also been a better option that what really happened.
Imagine if a minority Tory government, with limited and unofficial Lib Dem backing, had just taken power to be battered by the credit crunch, Northern Rock, rising fuel bills and House Price Carnage. Labour could have confidently and straight-facedly played the “if only the people who knew what they were doing, and who gave you 10 years of prosperity and good times were in charge” card. It would have worked, even if the Tories had only floundered as much on NR as Labour actually did (i.e. for a couple of months before doing the right thing).
With an inexperienced, toff-ish team trying to battle against a worsening global economy, with Labour attacking them on everything they did, with some of the press still vaguely on the Labour side (remember, nine months ago every commentator in the press didn’t hate Gordon Brown), with flaky Liberal support and with the Old Tory / New Tory divide re-emerging, the chances of lasting out for a five year term would be pretty damn limited. The prospects for an old hand coming back to take charge of Labour at the emergency post-collapse general election (Jack Straw PM, anyone?) would be looking pretty bright…
Instead, we’ve got two years of collapsing farce followed by five – probably ten – years of Tory misrule to look forward to. Luckily, I’m just about eligible as a skilled migrant under New Zealand’s point-based immigration scheme …
10 thoughts on “100% hindsight, 100% of the time”
Jack Straw PM? Are you insane?
what, you reckon he'd've been *less* popular than gordon?
my other suggestion would be milliband, but definitionally he's only worth 0.1% of me…
I heard he was changing his name to Megaband.
Squeegee merchants? ID cards? Asylum seeker humiliation vouchers? The man was foreign secretary when we attacked Iraq for fucksake!
Re (5), they have been doing that for years. The rest are a sensible idea if you want to keep this corrupt shower of cunts in power any longer. IT’S TIME FOR A NEW BUNCH OF CUNTS TO GET IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re (5), they have been doing that for years. The rest are a sensible idea if you want to keep this corrupt shower of cunts in power any longer. IT'S TIME FOR A NEW BUNCH OF CUNTS TO GET IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I hate my shitty internet connection and apologise for the double above.
I agree with 1). But Im afraid the idea that the justice policy is beholden to the tabloids is laughable nonsense. Its obviously beholden to the likes of yourself and the good readers of the Gruaniad.
It's time for a change in the UK – lets see if the conservatives can do a better job that the current bunch of twits – I can hardly see them doing worse.
As for migrating to New Zealand – yeah, I mean it's a bed of roses over there, they've got no problems at all – fantastic weather, no unemployment, great career prospects, a forward thinking modern democracy – erm, NOT.
Voting Conservative as an anti-Labour protest is like cutting your legs off to stop your toes itching.
(don't forget who the tories are)